Skip to main content
Educational analyticsNot betting advice · research use only.
GameTime Picks

← NFL hub

Regular season · week 2 · Sunday, Sep 20, 1:00 PM ET · final

Minnesota Vikings at Chicago Bears

Minnesota VikingsChicago BearsSaved on this device
Research matchup

Archived pregame read · published before kickoff. Everything below is the forecast revision the graded record names, read from its committed file and not regenerated. The final was MIN 9 – 3 CHI, from the Week 2 record.

What happened · official box score

Final: MIN 9 – 3 CHI

The played game's official lines, recorded Sep 20, 2026, the same lines the forecasts on this page were graded against. Under each actual is the Official Forecast published before kickoff, with its 80% range.

Minnesota Vikings · 9

PlayerPass ydsRush ydsRecRec ydsTD
Carson Wentz143Forecast 177 (92–303) · in range6Forecast 5 (0–34) · in range00NoForecast 10.4%
Aaron Jones0105Forecast 37 (9–102) · outside range0Forecast 2 (0–5) · in range0Forecast 17 (0–49) · in rangeNoForecast 45.2%
Justin Jefferson003Forecast 7 (2–14) · in range55Forecast 77 (34–145) · in rangeNoForecast 47.8%
T.J. Hockenson003Forecast 4 (1–8) · in range29Forecast 36 (11–80) · in rangeNoForecast 28.1%
Josh Oliver001Forecast 2 (0–5) · in range24Forecast 21 (0–58) · in rangeNoForecast 17.6%
Jordan Addison002Forecast 2 (0–5) · in range21Forecast 22 (0–59) · in rangeNoForecast 18.0%
DeeJay Dallas08112No
Demond Claiborne0012No
J.J. McCarthyNo line in the official box score—Forecast 180 (93–309)—Forecast 6 (0–42)———Forecast 12.9%
Max BrosmerNo line in the official box score—Forecast 86 (38–166)————
Player lines added up14311911143

26 other Minnesota Vikings players appear in the official box score with no passing, rushing or receiving line.

Chicago Bears · 3

PlayerPass ydsRush ydsRecRec ydsTD
Caleb Williams138Forecast 231 (127–381) · in range42Forecast 16 (1–68) · in range00NoForecast 29.7%
D'Andre Swift045Forecast 54 (14–141) · in range5Forecast 1 (0–3) · outside range54Forecast 8 (0–34) · outside rangeNoForecast 65.2%
Kyle Monangai047Forecast 33 (6–104) · in range2Forecast 1 (0–4) · in range11Forecast 13 (0–43) · in rangeNoForecast 42.6%
Tyson Bagent54000No
Rome Odunze003Forecast 3 (1–6) · in range43Forecast 34 (7–82) · in rangeNoForecast 22.7%
Kalif Raymond005Forecast 8 (3–15) · in range40Forecast 85 (40–157) · in rangeNoForecast 40.8%
Luther Burden III003Forecast 4 (1–8) · in range32Forecast 42 (13–93) · in rangeNoForecast 25.6%
Sam Roush0019No
Colston Loveland001Forecast 3 (1–7) · in range3Forecast 34 (9–79) · outside rangeNoForecast 24.3%
Cole Kmet000Forecast 2 (0–5) · in range0Forecast 19 (0–55) · in rangeNoForecast 18.2%
Brittain BrownNo line in the official box score——Forecast 1 (0–24)———Forecast 10.3%
Player lines added up19213420192

23 other Chicago Bears players appear in the official box score with no passing, rushing or receiving line.

Shown: the passing, rushing and receiving lines and touchdowns GameTimePicks records; defensive and kicking statistics are not recorded here. “Player lines added up” sums the players' lines, so team passing yards are before sack yardage. TD means a rushing, receiving, return or recovery touchdown; a thrown one does not count. “—” means the player has no line in the official box score. Every graded forecast for Week 2 is on the NFL week report.

Regular season · week 2 · Sunday, Sep 20, 1:00 PM ET · Soldier Field

Minnesota Vikings at Chicago Bears

Minnesota Vikings46.1% to win

Pregame projection

22–24

the middle of the outcomes, not a call on the exact final

Chicago Bears50.8% to win

Chicago Bears were the projected winner, 50.8% to win.

About 3% chance of a tie after regulation is not assigned to either team.

Expected margin

CHI +1

8 in 10 outcomes between -15 and +17

Expected total

46

8 in 10 outcomes between 28 and 62

Official Forecast · frozen before kickoff · graded after

The authorized GameTimePicks output for a game or player, frozen before the start and never edited afterwards. Each one is graded against the official result once the game is final, and results are published as games are graded. Player results grade the official player board's own pre-kickoff projections, each under the model and version that made it — the same projections the game pages and Weekly leaders show. The supporting simulations some game pages show are not graded in these results, so none of these results describe them.

Simulation story

5 chapters · the forecast as it stood before the start
› Loading the matchup model› Reading the outcome distribution from 10,000 simulated games› Preparing the score scenariosPress Play to step through what the model expects, chapter by chapter, or read the report below.

MIN @ CHI

Minnesota Vikings at Chicago Bears, Sun, Sep 20. This game has been played — what follows is the forecast as it was frozen BEFORE kickoff, not a current read.

model nfl-regular-season-public-v110,000 simulated gamesproduced Sep 20, 9:34 AM ET

Projected scorecard

expected statistical summaries · not one simulated game
MIN 22 — 24 CHIwin chance MIN 46.1% · CHI 50.8%total 46 (28–62)margin +1

MIN

Likely TD scorers

Justin Jefferson 47.8%

Aaron Jones 45.2%

T.J. Hockenson 28.1%

Passing

J.J. McCarthy 180 pass yds (93–309)

Rushing leaders

Aaron Jones 37 rush yds (9–102)

J.J. McCarthy 6 rush yds (0–42)

Receiving leaders

Justin Jefferson 7 rec · 77 yds

T.J. Hockenson 4 rec · 36 yds

Aaron Jones 2 rec · 17 yds

CHI

Likely TD scorers

D'Andre Swift 65.2%

Kyle Monangai 42.6%

Kalif Raymond 40.8%

Passing

Caleb Williams 231 pass yds (127–381)

Rushing leaders

D'Andre Swift 54 rush yds (14–141)

Kyle Monangai 33 rush yds (6–104)

Receiving leaders

Kalif Raymond 8 rec · 85 yds

Luther Burden III 4 rec · 42 yds

Colston Loveland 3 rec · 34 yds

pass interceptions · First/last/2+ touchdown — withheld, with the exact bar each failed
  • pass interceptions: research only, not published as a forecast
  • First/last/2+ touchdown: DISABLED — no ordering model and no calibration receipt of their own; never derived from anytime probabilities
Comparison

Us versus the sportsbooks

two independent reads, shown side by side

Our win chance

50.8%

CHI to win

Sportsbook win chance

65.8%

CHI to win, read from 9 sportsbooks' odds with their built-in margin removed

Difference

-15.1 pp

ours minus the sportsbooks', in percentage points — not a recommendation

Total points: ours vs sportsbooks

46 vs 47

our projected total against the sportsbooks' over/under line

The sportsbook numbers are the books' own, shown for context. A difference is a difference — this model is not validated to out-predict the sportsbook market.

Prices captured — before kickoff.

Player projections · 17 modelled

The player board

Every modelled player, with his availability. Players listed out carry no volume projection.

Every receiving family for one player on one row, ranked by median receptions.

PlayerTeamAvailabilityReceptions (10th–90th)Rec yards (10th–90th)TD chance
Kalif RaymondCHI8 (3–15)85 (40–157)40.8%
Justin JeffersonMIN7 (2–14)77 (34–145)47.8%
T.J. HockensonMIN4 (1–8)36 (11–80)28.1%
Luther Burden IIICHI4 (1–8)42 (13–93)25.6%
Colston LovelandCHI3 (1–7)34 (9–79)24.3%
Rome OdunzeCHI3 (1–6)34 (7–82)22.7%
Aaron JonesMIN2 (0–5)17 (0–49)45.2%
Cole KmetCHI2 (0–5)19 (0–55)18.2%
Jordan AddisonMIN2 (0–5)22 (0–59)18.0%
Josh OliverMIN2 (0–5)21 (0–58)17.6%
D'Andre SwiftCHI1 (0–3)8 (0–34)65.2%
Kyle MonangaiCHI1 (0–4)13 (0–43)42.6%
Families not shown, and the exact bar each failed (2)
  • pass interceptions: research only, not published as a forecast
  • First/last/2+ touchdown: DISABLED — no ordering model and no calibration receipt of their own; never derived from anytime probabilities

Scoring outlooktop 6 of 16 by TD chance · full list in the board’s TD tab

  • 65.2% D'Andre Swift · CHI
  • 47.8% Justin Jefferson · MIN
  • 45.2% Aaron Jones · MIN
  • 42.6% Kyle Monangai · CHI
  • 40.8% Kalif Raymond · CHI
  • 29.7% Caleb Williams · CHI

Anytime-scorer probability means scoring a touchdown — never throwing one. Void if the player does not play; questionable players carry their state above.

Reading key

What these numbers mean

Projected score
The middle outcome across every simulated game — not a prediction of the exact final.
Win chance
The model's chance for each side to win, from its team-strength rating — not a count of simulated wins. The simulated games show their own win share, and the difference, in Simulated game outcomes.
80% range
Eight in ten simulated games landed inside this band. Real games land outside it too.
pp (percentage points)
The plain difference between two percentages. A gap is a difference, not an advantage.
Official Forecast
The authorized GameTimePicks output for a game or player, frozen before the start and never edited afterwards. Each one is graded against the official result; its record on games played after it was frozen is still accumulating.
Technical detailsModel version, input fingerprint, timestamps and the per-family evaluation basis.

Where this came from

model
nfl-regular-season-public-v1 v2
simulations
10,000
input hash
aeb1ad509cd2af27
generated
kickoff
state
SETTLED
Player-family model provenance (4 published)
  • Rushing yards: Share-level model: cleared every bar when re-tested on 2014–2021 (14,502 player-games) — a second look at seasons examined once before, not a blind test. Each week's forecast is frozen before the first kickoff and graded; its blind 2026 record is still accumulating (0 graded player-games so far).
  • Receiving yards: Share-level model: cleared every bar when re-tested on 2014–2021 (27,134 player-games) — a second look at seasons examined once before, not a blind test. Each week's forecast is frozen before the first kickoff and graded; its blind 2026 record is still accumulating (0 graded player-games so far).
  • Receptions: Share-level model: cleared every bar when re-tested on 2014–2021 (27,134 player-games) — a second look at seasons examined once before, not a blind test. Each week's forecast is frozen before the first kickoff and graded; its blind 2026 record is still accumulating (0 graded player-games so far).
  • Anytime touchdown: Opportunity touchdown model: cleared every bar on a blind test of 2014–2021 (35,128 player-games never used to build it). Probabilities condition on playing — a player who does not play settles void. Each week's forecast is frozen before the first kickoff and graded; its blind 2026 record is still accumulating (0 graded player-games so far).

Our win chances come from a team rating that weights how decisively teams win. Tested on 4,281 past games it had never seen (2006–2021), it scored 0.629 on log loss (lower is better) — better than our previous rating's 0.642 and a coin flip's 0.693, but short of the sportsbooks' own odds at 0.610. It has NOT been shown to beat the sportsbook market. Where our win and margin ratings disagree on the favourite, the previous rating is used for that game. The 2026 season evaluation still runs under bars frozen in August, so every forecast stays experimental. These ratings are built from results, not from who is playing: they do not know that a starting quarterback has been ruled out. Our player projections do remove players who cannot play; the team win chance beside them does not. We tested whether adding that would help, using perfect hindsight about whether each team's main quarterback actually played — on 855 games from 2023 to 2025 it improved the win rating on average but was WORSE in one of the three seasons, so it did not clear the bar we hold these ratings to and we left the rating alone.

Educational and paper-only — not betting advice.

More

Other games with a simulation