Skip to main content
Educational analyticsNot betting advice · research use only.
GameTime Picks

← NFL hub

Regular season · week 2 · Sunday, Sep 20, 4:25 PM ET · final

Washington Commanders at Dallas Cowboys

Washington CommandersDallas CowboysSaved on this device
Research matchup

Archived pregame read · published before kickoff. Everything below is the forecast revision the graded record names, read from its committed file and not regenerated. The final was WSH 20 – 37 DAL, from the Week 2 record.

What happened · official box score

Final: WSH 20 – 37 DAL

The played game's official lines, recorded Sep 21, 2026, the same lines the forecasts on this page were graded against. Under each actual is the Official Forecast published before kickoff, with its 80% range.

Washington Commanders · 20

PlayerPass ydsRush ydsRecRec ydsTD
Jayden Daniels96Forecast 179 (95–303) · in range69Forecast 18 (2–70) · in range00NoForecast 18.0%
Marcus Mariota111Forecast 152 (75–269) · in range3Forecast 10 (0–53) · in range00NoForecast 12.8%
Rachaad White043Forecast 16 (2–63) · in range6Forecast 1 (0–4) · outside range40Forecast 11 (0–37) · outside rangeNoForecast 24.3%
Terry McLaurin002Forecast 4 (1–8) · in range50Forecast 39 (12–89) · in rangeNoForecast 25.4%
Jacory Croskey-Merritt043Forecast 41 (10–111) · in range15NoForecast 40.7%
Stefon Diggs005Forecast 6 (2–12) · in range47Forecast 66 (27–129) · in rangeYesForecast 40.4%
Antonio Williams003Forecast 3 (1–6) · in range24Forecast 30 (6–74) · in rangeNoForecast 21.8%
Kaytron Allen024Forecast 6 (0–41) · in range00NoForecast 10.6%
Dyami Brown004Forecast 1 (0–3) · outside range21Forecast 10 (0–38) · in rangeNoForecast 9.7%
Colson Yankoff00114No
Ben Sinnott0016No
Treylon Burks000Forecast 2 (0–6) · in range0Forecast 26 (4–65) · outside rangeNoForecast 19.2%
Jeremy McNicholsNo line in the official box score——Forecast 2 (0–29)—Forecast 2 (0–4)—Forecast 14 (0–45)—Forecast 17.8%
John BatesNo line in the official box score———Forecast 1 (0–4)—Forecast 12 (0–40)—Forecast 10.7%
Luke McCaffreyNo line in the official box score———Forecast 1 (0–3)—Forecast 10 (0–39)—Forecast 9.7%
Player lines added up20718223207

21 other Washington Commanders players appear in the official box score with no passing, rushing or receiving line.

Dallas Cowboys · 37

PlayerPass ydsRush ydsRecRec ydsTD
Dak Prescott279Forecast 209 (116–344) · in range26Forecast 4 (0–35) · in range00NoForecast 8.9%
CeeDee Lamb008Forecast 5 (1–10) · in range153Forecast 53 (20–109) · outside rangeYesForecast 35.0%
Javonte Williams030Forecast 55 (15–137) · in range3Forecast 2 (0–5) · in range20Forecast 21 (3–54) · in rangeNoForecast 57.0%
Jake Ferguson004Forecast 2 (0–5) · in range43Forecast 19 (0–51) · in rangeYesForecast 16.1%
George Pickens006Forecast 4 (1–8) · in range40Forecast 47 (16–103) · in rangeNoForecast 28.2%
Ryan Flournoy005Forecast 3 (1–6) · in range23Forecast 28 (5–69) · in rangeNoForecast 20.4%
Emari Demercado08Forecast 5 (0–40) · in range00NoForecast 8.7%
Hunter Luepke01Forecast 0 (0–20) · in range00NoForecast 7.5%
KaVontae Turpin010Forecast 1 (0–3) · in range0Forecast 8 (0–35) · in rangeNoForecast 9.9%
Brevyn Spann-Ford000Forecast 1 (0–3) · in range0Forecast 8 (0–34) · in rangeNoForecast 8.2%
Joe Milton IIINo line in the official box score——Forecast 0 (0–20)———Forecast 4.8%
Player lines added up2796626279

23 other Dallas Cowboys players appear in the official box score with no passing, rushing or receiving line.

Shown: the passing, rushing and receiving lines and touchdowns GameTimePicks records; defensive and kicking statistics are not recorded here. “Player lines added up” sums the players' lines, so team passing yards are before sack yardage. TD means a rushing, receiving, return or recovery touchdown; a thrown one does not count. “—” means the player has no line in the official box score. Every graded forecast for Week 2 is on the NFL week report.

Regular season · week 2 · Sunday, Sep 20, 4:25 PM ET · AT&T Stadium

Washington Commanders at Dallas Cowboys

Washington Commanders46.2% to win

Pregame projection

26–29

the middle of the outcomes, not a call on the exact final

Dallas Cowboys51.0% to win

Dallas Cowboys were the projected winner, 51.0% to win.

About 3% chance of a tie after regulation is not assigned to either team.

Expected margin

DAL +3

8 in 10 outcomes between -14 and +20

Expected total

55

8 in 10 outcomes between 38 and 72

Official Forecast · frozen before kickoff · graded after

The authorized GameTimePicks output for a game or player, frozen before the start and never edited afterwards. Each one is graded against the official result once the game is final, and results are published as games are graded. Player results grade the official player board's own pre-kickoff projections, each under the model and version that made it — the same projections the game pages and Weekly leaders show. The supporting simulations some game pages show are not graded in these results, so none of these results describe them.

Simulation story

5 chapters · the forecast as it stood before the start
› Loading the matchup model› Reading the outcome distribution from 10,000 simulated games› Preparing the score scenariosPress Play to step through what the model expects, chapter by chapter, or read the report below.

WSH @ DAL

Washington Commanders at Dallas Cowboys, Sun, Sep 20. This game has been played — what follows is the forecast as it was frozen BEFORE kickoff, not a current read.

model nfl-regular-season-public-v110,000 simulated gamesproduced Sep 20, 2:09 PM ET

Projected scorecard

expected statistical summaries · not one simulated game
WSH 26 — 29 DALwin chance WSH 46.2% · DAL 51.0%total 55 (38–72)margin +3

WSH

Likely TD scorers

Jacory Croskey-Merritt 40.7%

Stefon Diggs 40.4%

Terry McLaurin 25.4%

Passing

Jayden Daniels 179 pass yds (95–303)

Rushing leaders

Jacory Croskey-Merritt 41 rush yds (10–111)

Jayden Daniels 18 rush yds (2–70)

Receiving leaders

Stefon Diggs 6 rec · 66 yds

Terry McLaurin 4 rec · 39 yds

Antonio Williams 3 rec · 30 yds

DAL

Likely TD scorers

Javonte Williams 57.0%

CeeDee Lamb 35.0%

George Pickens 28.2%

Passing

Dak Prescott 209 pass yds (116–344)

Rushing leaders

Javonte Williams 55 rush yds (15–137)

Emari Demercado 5 rush yds (0–40)

Receiving leaders

CeeDee Lamb 5 rec · 53 yds

George Pickens 4 rec · 47 yds

Ryan Flournoy 3 rec · 28 yds

pass interceptions · First/last/2+ touchdown — withheld, with the exact bar each failed
  • pass interceptions: research only, not published as a forecast
  • First/last/2+ touchdown: DISABLED — no ordering model and no calibration receipt of their own; never derived from anytime probabilities
Comparison

Us versus the sportsbooks

two independent reads, shown side by side

Our win chance

51.0%

DAL to win

Sportsbook win chance

65.1%

DAL to win, read from 5 sportsbooks' odds with their built-in margin removed

Difference

-14.1 pp

ours minus the sportsbooks', in percentage points — not a recommendation

Total points: ours vs sportsbooks

55 vs 51

our projected total against the sportsbooks' over/under line

The sportsbook numbers are the books' own, shown for context. A difference is a difference — this model is not validated to out-predict the sportsbook market.

Prices captured — before kickoff.

Player projections · 24 modelled

The player board

Every modelled player, with his availability. Players listed out carry no volume projection.

Every receiving family for one player on one row, ranked by median receptions.

PlayerTeamAvailabilityReceptions (10th–90th)Rec yards (10th–90th)TD chance
Stefon DiggsWSH6 (2–12)66 (27–129)40.4%
CeeDee LambDAL5 (1–10)53 (20–109)35.0%
George PickensDAL4 (1–8)47 (16–103)28.2%
Terry McLaurinWSH4 (1–8)39 (12–89)25.4%
Antonio WilliamsWSH3 (1–6)30 (6–74)21.8%
Ryan FlournoyDAL3 (1–6)28 (5–69)20.4%
Javonte WilliamsDAL2 (0–5)21 (3–54)57.0%
Treylon BurksWSH2 (0–6)26 (4–65)19.2%
Jeremy McNicholsWSH2 (0–4)14 (0–45)17.8%
Jake FergusonDAL2 (0–5)19 (0–51)16.1%
Rachaad WhiteWSH1 (0–4)11 (0–37)24.3%
John BatesWSH1 (0–4)12 (0–40)10.7%
KaVontae TurpinDAL1 (0–3)8 (0–35)9.9%
Luke McCaffreyWSH1 (0–3)10 (0–39)9.7%
Dyami BrownWSH1 (0–3)10 (0–38)9.7%
Brevyn Spann-FordDAL1 (0–3)8 (0–34)8.2%
Families not shown, and the exact bar each failed (2)
  • pass interceptions: research only, not published as a forecast
  • First/last/2+ touchdown: DISABLED — no ordering model and no calibration receipt of their own; never derived from anytime probabilities

Scoring outlooktop 6 of 24 by TD chance · full list in the board’s TD tab

  • 57.0% Javonte Williams · DAL
  • 40.7% Jacory Croskey-Merritt · WSH
  • 40.4% Stefon Diggs · WSH
  • 35.0% CeeDee Lamb · DAL
  • 28.2% George Pickens · DAL
  • 25.4% Terry McLaurin · WSH

Anytime-scorer probability means scoring a touchdown — never throwing one. Void if the player does not play; questionable players carry their state above.

Reading key

What these numbers mean

Projected score
The middle outcome across every simulated game — not a prediction of the exact final.
Win chance
The model's chance for each side to win, from its team-strength rating — not a count of simulated wins. The simulated games show their own win share, and the difference, in Simulated game outcomes.
80% range
Eight in ten simulated games landed inside this band. Real games land outside it too.
pp (percentage points)
The plain difference between two percentages. A gap is a difference, not an advantage.
Official Forecast
The authorized GameTimePicks output for a game or player, frozen before the start and never edited afterwards. Each one is graded against the official result; its record on games played after it was frozen is still accumulating.
Technical detailsModel version, input fingerprint, timestamps and the per-family evaluation basis.

Where this came from

model
nfl-regular-season-public-v1 v2
simulations
10,000
input hash
96453180642e3d77
generated
kickoff
state
SETTLED
Player-family model provenance (4 published)
  • Rushing yards: Share-level model: cleared every bar when re-tested on 2014–2021 (14,502 player-games) — a second look at seasons examined once before, not a blind test. Each week's forecast is frozen before the first kickoff and graded; its blind 2026 record is still accumulating (0 graded player-games so far).
  • Receiving yards: Share-level model: cleared every bar when re-tested on 2014–2021 (27,134 player-games) — a second look at seasons examined once before, not a blind test. Each week's forecast is frozen before the first kickoff and graded; its blind 2026 record is still accumulating (0 graded player-games so far).
  • Receptions: Share-level model: cleared every bar when re-tested on 2014–2021 (27,134 player-games) — a second look at seasons examined once before, not a blind test. Each week's forecast is frozen before the first kickoff and graded; its blind 2026 record is still accumulating (0 graded player-games so far).
  • Anytime touchdown: Opportunity touchdown model: cleared every bar on a blind test of 2014–2021 (35,128 player-games never used to build it). Probabilities condition on playing — a player who does not play settles void. Each week's forecast is frozen before the first kickoff and graded; its blind 2026 record is still accumulating (0 graded player-games so far).

Our win chances come from a team rating that weights how decisively teams win. Tested on 4,281 past games it had never seen (2006–2021), it scored 0.629 on log loss (lower is better) — better than our previous rating's 0.642 and a coin flip's 0.693, but short of the sportsbooks' own odds at 0.610. It has NOT been shown to beat the sportsbook market. Where our win and margin ratings disagree on the favourite, the previous rating is used for that game. The 2026 season evaluation still runs under bars frozen in August, so every forecast stays experimental. These ratings are built from results, not from who is playing: they do not know that a starting quarterback has been ruled out. Our player projections do remove players who cannot play; the team win chance beside them does not. We tested whether adding that would help, using perfect hindsight about whether each team's main quarterback actually played — on 855 games from 2023 to 2025 it improved the win rating on average but was WORSE in one of the three seasons, so it did not clear the bar we hold these ratings to and we left the rating alone.

Educational and paper-only — not betting advice.

More

Other games with a simulation