Skip to main content
Educational analyticsNot betting advice · research use only.
GameTime Picks

← NFL hub

Regular season · week 1 · Sunday, Sep 13, 4:25 PM ET · final

Arizona Cardinals at Los Angeles Chargers

Arizona CardinalsLos Angeles ChargersSaved on this device
Research matchup

Archived pregame read · published before kickoff. Everything below is the forecast revision the graded record names, read from its committed file and not regenerated. The final was ARI 26 – 14 LAC, from the Week 1 record.

What happened · official box score

Final: ARI 26 – 14 LAC

The played game's official lines, recorded Sep 14, 2026, the same lines the forecasts on this page were graded against. Under each actual is the Official Forecast published before kickoff, with its 80% range.

Arizona Cardinals · 26

PlayerPass ydsRush ydsRecRec ydsTD
Jacoby Brissett277Forecast 166 (52–290) · in range14Forecast 5 (0–29) · in range00NoForecast 7.9%
Trey McBride009Forecast 5 (2–9) · in range95Forecast 51 (15–104) · in rangeYesForecast 29.4%
Kendrick Bourne00875No
Tyler Allgeier06129No
Michael Wilson005Forecast 4 (1–7) · in range56Forecast 42 (9–95) · in rangeNoForecast 38.1%
Jeremiyah Love04129Yes
Marvin Harrison Jr.001Forecast 2 (0–5) · in range33Forecast 26 (0–70) · in rangeNoForecast 16.2%
Bam KnightNo line in the official box score——Forecast 20 (3–52)—Forecast 1 (0–3)—Forecast 7 (0–35)—Forecast 22.1%
Elijah HigginsNo line in the official box score———Forecast 1 (0–4)—Forecast 11 (0–44)—
Player lines added up27711627277

23 other Arizona Cardinals players appear in the official box score with no passing, rushing or receiving line.

Los Angeles Chargers · 14

PlayerPass ydsRush ydsRecRec ydsTD
Justin Herbert209Forecast 162 (53–281) · in range29Forecast 21 (2–59) · in range00NoForecast 15.7%
Ladd McConkey005Forecast 3 (1–6) · in range82Forecast 27 (2–70) · outside rangeYesForecast 29.4%
David Njoku00558No
Omarion Hampton043Forecast 37 (10–79) · in range0Forecast 1 (0–4) · in range0Forecast 11 (0–43) · in rangeYesForecast 47.1%
Oronde Gadsden002Forecast 2 (0–4) · in range32Forecast 18 (0–55) · in rangeNoForecast 23.9%
Tre' Harris003Forecast 1 (0–4) · in range20Forecast 13 (0–47) · in rangeNo
Quentin Johnston002Forecast 3 (1–6) · in range17Forecast 29 (3–74) · in rangeNoForecast 30.4%
Keaton Mitchell0900No
KeAndre Lambert-SmithNo line in the official box score—————Forecast 27.2%
Kimani VidalNo line in the official box score——Forecast 30 (8–68)———Forecast 23.2%
Trey LanceNo line in the official box score——Forecast 12 (0–41)———
Player lines added up2098117209

21 other Los Angeles Chargers players appear in the official box score with no passing, rushing or receiving line.

Shown: the passing, rushing and receiving lines and touchdowns GameTimePicks records; defensive and kicking statistics are not recorded here. “Player lines added up” sums the players' lines, so team passing yards are before sack yardage. TD means a rushing, receiving, return or recovery touchdown; a thrown one does not count. “—” means the player has no line in the official box score. Every graded forecast for Week 1 is on the NFL week report.

Regular season · week 1 · Sunday, Sep 13, 4:25 PM ET · SoFi Stadium

Arizona Cardinals at Los Angeles Chargers

Arizona Cardinals29.9% to win

Pregame projection

18–29

the middle of the outcomes, not a call on the exact final

Los Angeles Chargers68.2% to win

Los Angeles Chargers were the projected winner, 68.2% to win.

About 2% chance of a tie after regulation is not assigned to either team.

Expected margin

LAC +10

8 in 10 outcomes between -7 and +27

Expected total

47

8 in 10 outcomes between 30 and 64

Official Forecast · frozen before kickoff · graded after

The authorized GameTimePicks output for a game or player, frozen before the start and never edited afterwards. Each one is graded against the official result once the game is final, and results are published as games are graded. Player results grade the official player board's own pre-kickoff projections, each under the model and version that made it — the same projections the game pages and Weekly leaders show. The supporting simulations some game pages show are not graded in these results, so none of these results describe them.

Simulation story

5 chapters · the forecast as it stood before the start
› Loading the matchup model› Reading the outcome distribution from 10,000 simulated games› Preparing the score scenariosPress Play to step through what the model expects, chapter by chapter, or read the report below.

ARI @ LAC

Arizona Cardinals at Los Angeles Chargers, Sun, Sep 13. This game has been played — what follows is the forecast as it was frozen BEFORE kickoff, not a current read.

model nfl-regular-season-public-v110,000 simulated gamesproduced Sep 13, 2:02 PM ET

Projected scorecard

expected statistical summaries · not one simulated game
ARI 18 — 29 LACwin chance ARI 29.9% · LAC 68.2%total 47 (30–64)margin +10

ARI

Likely TD scorers

Michael Wilson 38.1%

Trey McBride 29.4%

Bam Knight 22.1%

Passing

Jacoby Brissett 166 pass yds (52–290)

Rushing leaders

Bam Knight 20 rush yds (3–52)

Jacoby Brissett 5 rush yds (0–29)

Receiving leaders

Trey McBride 5 rec · 51 yds

Michael Wilson 4 rec · 42 yds

Marvin Harrison Jr. 2 rec · 26 yds

LAC

Likely TD scorers

Omarion Hampton 47.1%

Quentin Johnston 30.4%

Ladd McConkey 29.4%

Passing

Justin Herbert 162 pass yds (53–281)

Rushing leaders

Omarion Hampton 37 rush yds (10–79)

Kimani Vidal 30 rush yds (8–68)

Receiving leaders

Quentin Johnston 3 rec · 29 yds

Ladd McConkey 3 rec · 27 yds

Oronde Gadsden 2 rec · 18 yds

pass interceptions · First/last/2+ touchdown — withheld, with the exact bar each failed
  • pass interceptions: research only, not published as a forecast
  • First/last/2+ touchdown: DISABLED — no ordering model and no calibration receipt of their own; never derived from anytime probabilities
Comparison

Us versus the sportsbooks

two independent reads, shown side by side

Our win chance

68.2%

LAC to win

Sportsbook win chance

80.0%

LAC to win, read from 11 sportsbooks' odds with their built-in margin removed

Difference

-11.8 pp

ours minus the sportsbooks', in percentage points — not a recommendation

Total points: ours vs sportsbooks

47 vs 47

our projected total against the sportsbooks' over/under line

The sportsbook numbers are the books' own, shown for context. A difference is a difference — this model has not been shown to beat the market.

Prices captured — before kickoff.

Player projections · 15 modelled

The player board

Every modelled player, with his availability. Players listed out carry no volume projection.

Every receiving family for one player on one row, ranked by median receptions.

PlayerTeamAvailabilityReceptions (10th–90th)Rec yards (10th–90th)TD chance
Trey McBrideARIprojected active5 (2–9)51 (15–104)29.4%
Michael WilsonARIprojected active4 (1–7)42 (9–95)38.1%
Quentin JohnstonLACprojected active3 (1–6)29 (3–74)30.4%
Ladd McConkeyLACprojected active3 (1–6)27 (2–70)29.4%
Oronde GadsdenLACprojected active2 (0–4)18 (0–55)23.9%
Marvin Harrison Jr.ARIprojected active2 (0–5)26 (0–70)16.2%
Omarion HamptonLACprojected active1 (0–4)11 (0–43)47.1%
Bam KnightARIprojected active1 (0–3)7 (0–35)22.1%
Tre' HarrisLAC1 (0–4)13 (0–47)—
Elijah HigginsARI1 (0–4)11 (0–44)—
Families not shown, and the exact bar each failed (2)
  • pass interceptions: research only, not published as a forecast
  • First/last/2+ touchdown: DISABLED — no ordering model and no calibration receipt of their own; never derived from anytime probabilities

Scoring outlooktop 6 of 12 by TD chance · full list in the board’s TD tab

  • 47.1% Omarion Hampton · LAC
  • 38.1% Michael Wilson · ARI
  • 30.4% Quentin Johnston · LAC
  • 29.4% Trey McBride · ARI
  • 29.4% Ladd McConkey · LAC
  • 27.2% KeAndre Lambert-Smith · LAC

Anytime-scorer probability means scoring a touchdown — never throwing one. Void if the player does not play; questionable players carry their state above.

Reading key

What these numbers mean

Projected score
The middle outcome across every simulated game — not a prediction of the exact final.
Win chance
The model's chance for each side to win, from its team-strength rating — not a count of simulated wins. The simulated games show their own win share, and the difference, in Simulated game outcomes.
80% range
Eight in ten simulated games landed inside this band. Real games land outside it too.
pp (percentage points)
The plain difference between two percentages. A gap is a difference, not an advantage.
Official Forecast
The authorized GameTimePicks output for a game or player, frozen before the start and never edited afterwards. Each one is graded against the official result; its record on games played after it was frozen is still accumulating.
Technical detailsModel version, input fingerprint, timestamps and the per-family evaluation basis.

Where this came from

model
nfl-regular-season-public-v1 v1
simulations
10,000
input hash
452ac0e5ebee178e
generated
kickoff
state
SETTLED
Player-family model provenance (3 published)
  • Receiving yards: props-v1 evaluation: n=3575, all promotion bars pass
  • Receptions: props-v1 evaluation: n=3575, all promotion bars pass
  • Anytime touchdown: anytime-td-v1 calibration: held-out 2025 n=3965, beats both baselines; DNP settles void, so probabilities condition on playing

Our win chances come from a team rating that weights how decisively teams win. Tested on 4,281 past games it had never seen (2006–2021), it scored 0.629 on log loss (lower is better) — better than our previous rating's 0.642 and a coin flip's 0.693, but short of the sportsbooks' own odds at 0.610. It has NOT been shown to beat the sportsbook market. Where our win and margin ratings disagree on the favourite, the previous rating is used for that game. The 2026 season evaluation still runs under bars frozen in August, so every forecast stays experimental. These ratings are built from results, not from who is playing: they do not know that a starting quarterback has been ruled out. Our player projections do remove players who cannot play; the team win chance beside them does not. We tested whether adding that would help, using perfect hindsight about whether each team's main quarterback actually played — on 855 games from 2023 to 2025 it improved the win rating on average but was WORSE in one of the three seasons, so it did not clear the bar we hold these ratings to and we left the rating alone.

Educational and paper-only — not betting advice.

More

Other games with a simulation