Skip to main content
Educational analyticsNot betting advice · research use only.
GameTime Picks

← NFL hub

Regular season · week 1 · Sunday, Sep 13, 1:00 PM ET · final

Baltimore Ravens at Indianapolis Colts

Baltimore RavensIndianapolis ColtsSaved on this device
Research matchup

Archived pregame read · published before kickoff. Everything below is the forecast revision the graded record names, read from its committed file and not regenerated. The final was BAL 41 – 23 IND, from the Week 1 record.

What happened · official box score

Final: BAL 41 – 23 IND

The played game's official lines, recorded Sep 14, 2026, the same lines the forecasts on this page were graded against. Under each actual is the Official Forecast published before kickoff, with its 80% range.

Baltimore Ravens · 41

PlayerPass ydsRush ydsRecRec ydsTD
Lamar Jackson324Forecast 160 (40–297) · outside range40Forecast 10 (0–39) · outside range00YesForecast 14.0%
Derrick Henry0144Forecast 57 (21–111) · outside range119YesForecast 45.9%
Zay Flowers005Forecast 5 (2–9) · in range150Forecast 59 (19–124) · outside rangeYesForecast 33.7%
Chris Moore00153No
Mark Andrews004Forecast 3 (1–6) · in range49Forecast 26 (2–68) · in rangeNoForecast 16.3%
Justice Hill0181Forecast 1 (0–3) · in range10Forecast 8 (0–38) · in rangeNoForecast 26.1%
LaJohntay Wester00215No
Matthew Hibner00113No
Ja'Kobi Lane00111No
Durham Smythe0014No
Rasheen Ali0000NoForecast 13.3%
Rashod Bateman000Forecast 1 (0–4) · in range0Forecast 11 (0–46) · in rangeNoForecast 11.1%
Devontez WalkerNo line in the official box score—————Forecast 20.0%
Tyler HuntleyNo line in the official box score—Forecast 68 (0–197)—Forecast 4 (0–29)———
Player lines added up32420217324

20 other Baltimore Ravens players appear in the official box score with no passing, rushing or receiving line.

Indianapolis Colts · 23

PlayerPass ydsRush ydsRecRec ydsTD
Daniel Jones166Forecast 135 (25–271) · in range4Forecast 4 (0–27) · in range00NoForecast 17.2%
Jonathan Taylor098Forecast 65 (27–117) · in range3Forecast 2 (0–4) · in range23Forecast 14 (0–49) · in rangeYesForecast 37.2%
Alec Pierce004Forecast 2 (1–5) · in range61Forecast 29 (0–81) · in rangeNoForecast 35.1%
Josh Downs002Forecast 3 (1–6) · in range37Forecast 26 (1–69) · in rangeNoForecast 23.5%
Keenan Allen00632No
Tyler Warren003Forecast 3 (1–6.1) · in range13Forecast 33 (5–77) · in rangeYesForecast 14.0%
Seth McGowan0010No
Anthony Richardson Sr.No line in the official box score——Forecast 4 (0–26)———Forecast 17.5%
DJ GiddensNo line in the official box score——Forecast 8 (0–34)———
Mo Alie-CoxNo line in the official box score———Forecast 1 (0–3)—Forecast 6 (0–35)—Forecast 16.0%
Riley LeonardNo line in the official box score—————Forecast 25.0%
Player lines added up16610219166

25 other Indianapolis Colts players appear in the official box score with no passing, rushing or receiving line.

Shown: the passing, rushing and receiving lines and touchdowns GameTimePicks records; defensive and kicking statistics are not recorded here. “Player lines added up” sums the players' lines, so team passing yards are before sack yardage. TD means a rushing, receiving, return or recovery touchdown; a thrown one does not count. “—” means the player has no line in the official box score. Every graded forecast for Week 1 is on the NFL week report.

Regular season · week 1 · Sunday, Sep 13, 1:00 PM ET · Lucas Oil Stadium

Baltimore Ravens at Indianapolis Colts

Baltimore Ravens46.9% to win

Pregame projection

24–26

the middle of the outcomes, not a call on the exact final

Indianapolis Colts50.1% to win

Indianapolis Colts were the projected winner, 50.1% to win.

About 3% chance of a tie after regulation is not assigned to either team.

Expected margin

IND +1

8 in 10 outcomes between -17 and +18

Expected total

50

8 in 10 outcomes between 33 and 67

Official Forecast · frozen before kickoff · graded after

The authorized GameTimePicks output for a game or player, frozen before the start and never edited afterwards. Each one is graded against the official result once the game is final, and results are published as games are graded. Player results grade the official player board's own pre-kickoff projections, each under the model and version that made it — the same projections the game pages and Weekly leaders show. The supporting simulations some game pages show are not graded in these results, so none of these results describe them.

Simulation story

5 chapters · the forecast as it stood before the start
› Loading the matchup model› Reading the outcome distribution from 10,000 simulated games› Preparing the score scenariosPress Play to step through what the model expects, chapter by chapter, or read the report below.

BAL @ IND

Baltimore Ravens at Indianapolis Colts, Sun, Sep 13. This game has been played — what follows is the forecast as it was frozen BEFORE kickoff, not a current read.

model nfl-regular-season-public-v110,000 simulated gamesproduced Sep 13, 9:48 AM ET

Projected scorecard

expected statistical summaries · not one simulated game
BAL 24 — 26 INDwin chance BAL 46.9% · IND 50.1%total 50 (33–67)margin +1

BAL

Likely TD scorers

Derrick Henry 45.9%

Zay Flowers 33.7%

Justice Hill 26.1%

Passing

Lamar Jackson 160 pass yds (40–297)

Rushing leaders

Derrick Henry 57 rush yds (21–111)

Lamar Jackson 10 rush yds (0–39)

Receiving leaders

Zay Flowers 5 rec · 59 yds

Mark Andrews 3 rec · 26 yds

Justice Hill 1 rec · 8 yds

IND

Likely TD scorers

Jonathan Taylor 37.2%

Alec Pierce 35.1%

Riley Leonard 25.0%

Passing

Daniel Jones 135 pass yds (25–271)

Rushing leaders

Jonathan Taylor 65 rush yds (27–117)

DJ Giddens 8 rush yds (0–34)

Receiving leaders

Josh Downs 3 rec · 26 yds

Tyler Warren 3 rec · 33 yds

Jonathan Taylor 2 rec · 14 yds

pass interceptions · First/last/2+ touchdown — withheld, with the exact bar each failed
  • pass interceptions: research only, not published as a forecast
  • First/last/2+ touchdown: DISABLED — no ordering model and no calibration receipt of their own; never derived from anytime probabilities
Comparison

Us versus the sportsbooks

two independent reads, shown side by side

Our win chance

50.1%

IND to win

Sportsbook win chance

39.6%

IND to win, read from 8 sportsbooks' odds with their built-in margin removed

Difference

+10.5 pp

ours minus the sportsbooks', in percentage points — not a recommendation

Total points: ours vs sportsbooks

50 vs 48

our projected total against the sportsbooks' over/under line

The sportsbook numbers are the books' own, shown for context. A difference is a difference — this model has not been shown to beat the market.

Prices captured — before kickoff.

Player projections · 18 modelled

The player board

Every modelled player, with his availability. Players listed out carry no volume projection.

Every receiving family for one player on one row, ranked by median receptions.

PlayerTeamAvailabilityReceptions (10th–90th)Rec yards (10th–90th)TD chance
Zay FlowersBALprojected active5 (2–9)59 (19–124)33.7%
Josh DownsINDprojected active3 (1–6)26 (1–69)23.5%
Mark AndrewsBALprojected active3 (1–6)26 (2–68)16.3%
Tyler WarrenINDprojected active3 (1–6.1)33 (5–77)14.0%
Jonathan TaylorINDprojected active2 (0–4)14 (0–49)37.2%
Alec PierceINDprojected active2 (1–5)29 (0–81)35.1%
Justice HillBALprojected active1 (0–3)8 (0–38)26.1%
Mo Alie-CoxINDprojected active1 (0–3)6 (0–35)16.0%
Rashod BatemanBALprojected active1 (0–4)11 (0–46)11.1%
Families not shown, and the exact bar each failed (2)
  • pass interceptions: research only, not published as a forecast
  • First/last/2+ touchdown: DISABLED — no ordering model and no calibration receipt of their own; never derived from anytime probabilities

Scoring outlooktop 6 of 15 by TD chance · full list in the board’s TD tab

  • 45.9% Derrick Henry · BAL
  • 37.2% Jonathan Taylor · IND
  • 35.1% Alec Pierce · IND
  • 33.7% Zay Flowers · BAL
  • 26.1% Justice Hill · BAL
  • 25.0% Riley Leonard · IND

Anytime-scorer probability means scoring a touchdown — never throwing one. Void if the player does not play; questionable players carry their state above.

Reading key

What these numbers mean

Projected score
The middle outcome across every simulated game — not a prediction of the exact final.
Win chance
The model's chance for each side to win, from its team-strength rating — not a count of simulated wins. The simulated games show their own win share, and the difference, in Simulated game outcomes.
80% range
Eight in ten simulated games landed inside this band. Real games land outside it too.
pp (percentage points)
The plain difference between two percentages. A gap is a difference, not an advantage.
Official Forecast
The authorized GameTimePicks output for a game or player, frozen before the start and never edited afterwards. Each one is graded against the official result; its record on games played after it was frozen is still accumulating.
Technical detailsModel version, input fingerprint, timestamps and the per-family evaluation basis.

Where this came from

model
nfl-regular-season-public-v1 v1
simulations
10,000
input hash
84e2d1f74b570ce9
generated
kickoff
state
SETTLED
Player-family model provenance (3 published)
  • Receiving yards: props-v1 evaluation: n=3575, all promotion bars pass
  • Receptions: props-v1 evaluation: n=3575, all promotion bars pass
  • Anytime touchdown: anytime-td-v1 calibration: held-out 2025 n=3965, beats both baselines; DNP settles void, so probabilities condition on playing

Our win chances come from a team rating that weights how decisively teams win. Tested on 4,281 past games it had never seen (2006–2021), it scored 0.629 on log loss (lower is better) — better than our previous rating's 0.642 and a coin flip's 0.693, but short of the sportsbooks' own odds at 0.610. It has NOT been shown to beat the sportsbook market. Where our win and margin ratings disagree on the favourite, the previous rating is used for that game. The 2026 season evaluation still runs under bars frozen in August, so every forecast stays experimental. These ratings are built from results, not from who is playing: they do not know that a starting quarterback has been ruled out. Our player projections do remove players who cannot play; the team win chance beside them does not. We tested whether adding that would help, using perfect hindsight about whether each team's main quarterback actually played — on 855 games from 2023 to 2025 it improved the win rating on average but was WORSE in one of the three seasons, so it did not clear the bar we hold these ratings to and we left the rating alone.

Educational and paper-only — not betting advice.

More

Other games with a simulation