Skip to main content
Educational analyticsNot betting advice · research use only.
GameTime Picks

NFL · DET @ ARI · Simulation

Detroit Lions at Arizona Cardinals

Simulation · experimental · 10,000 coherent game paths

Simulation V2 · experimental · how to read this page

Each run is one internally consistent possible game: drives, plays, player stats and points all add up inside that run. The numbers below summarise all 10,000 simulated games.

This is a separate, experimental engine, not our main forecast. It is not independent of it: each team's scoring level is set so the simulated average total and margin match the Game Time Forecast's expected total and margin. It has not been shown to be more accurate than the Game Time Forecast: on held-out past games its win chances scored slightly worse. It is shown for exploration, takes no betting-market input, and feeds no pick or product. It was frozen before kickoff and is never re-run with live information.

Game Time Forecast · our main model · separate from this simulation

DET 29 — 25 ARI · win chance DET 61.9% · ARI 35.2% · total 54

A different engine, anchored to the Game Time Forecast's expected total and margin. Open the Game Time Forecast.

Game outcome · Simulation V2

65.3%DET win in the simulated games
34.3%ARI win in the simulated games
0.4%tie after overtime
3.5%game goes to overtime
DET 30 – 24 ARImedian score · averages 29.46 – 24.1
53median total · 80% of games 36–71
DET by 5median margin · 80% range: DET by 23 to ARI by 12
44.5%one-score game (decided by 8 or fewer)
8.4% · 6.5%decided by exactly 3 · by exactly 7

Score distribution

Final margin: ARI points minus DET points (below 0 means DET won). Bars group 3 points; the solid bar holds the median (-5). Range shown -63 to 51.
Final total points. Bars group 4 points; the solid bar holds the median (53). Range shown 0 to 108.

Each team's score

TeamLow (10th)MedianHigh (90th)Average
DET17304229.46
ARI13243724.1

Quarters and halves

From the same simulated games, so the quarters add up to each game's final. Overtime is shown above.

PeriodDET median (80%)ARI median (80%)Both teams (80%)DET wins itARI wins itLevel
Q17 (0–14)6 (0–11)10 (3–21)49.0%35.3%15.7%
Q27 (0–16)7 (0–14)16 (7–25)52.6%35.7%11.6%
Q37 (0–14)6 (0–12)10 (3–21)48.5%34.4%17.1%
Q47 (0–14)7 (0–14)14 (6–24)49.2%36.0%14.8%
1st half14 (6–24)13 (3–21)27 (16–40)57.7%36.3%6.0%
2nd half14 (6–24)10 (3–21)26 (14–38)55.6%36.6%7.8%

Team box · median (80% range)

StatDETARI
Drives11 (9–13)11 (9–13)
Plays64 (51–76)62 (50–75)
Pass attempts33 (25–43)34 (26–44)
Completions23 (16–30)24 (17–32)
Passing yards244 (156–342)227 (139–325)
Passing TDs2 (1–4)2 (0–3)
Interceptions0 (0–1)1 (0–2)
Sacks taken2 (0–4)2 (0–4)
Rush attempts27 (19–36)24 (17–33)
Rushing yards135 (70–221)120 (59–201)
Rushing TDs1 (0–3)1 (0–2)
Field goals made2 (0–3)1 (0–3)

Touchdowns per team

Touchdowns012345+
DET1.4%7.8%18.9%27.0%24.5%20.4%
ARI3.7%15.4%27.5%27.2%17.0%9.1%

Players · median (80% range)

Player lines are slices of the same simulated games: in every run, receivers' catches and yards add up to their passer's, and carries add up to the team's. Volume a named player does not get goes to "Other", so nothing is forced onto a starter. Players ruled out before the simulation get no snaps.

DET passing

PlayerAttemptsCompletionsYardsTDs (avg)INTs (avg)
Jared Goff QB29 (22–38)20 (14–27)215 (133–312)1.90.4

DET rushing

PlayerCarriesYardsRush TDs (avg)
Jahmyr Gibbs RB18 (12–25)88 (38–158)0.9
Jared Goff QB3 (1–6)12 (0–38)0.1
Sione Vaki RB1 (0–3)3 (0–21)0.1

DET receiving

PlayerTargetsCatchesYardsRec TDs (avg)
Amon-Ra St. Brown WR8 (5–13)6 (3–9)56 (18–114)0.6
Sam LaPorta TE6 (3–9)4 (2–7)37 (8–86)0.4
Jahmyr Gibbs RB5 (2–9)4 (1–7)33 (6–79)0.3
Jameson Williams WR5 (2–8)3 (1–6)31 (4–80)0.3
Isaac TeSlaa WR3 (1–5)2 (0–4)17 (0–57)0.2
Brock Wright TE1 (0–3)1 (0–2)3 (0–29)0.1

ARI passing

PlayerAttemptsCompletionsYardsTDs (avg)INTs (avg)
Jacoby Brissett QB30 (22–39)21 (15–28)198 (118–292)1.50.6

ARI rushing

PlayerCarriesYardsRush TDs (avg)
Jeremiyah Love RB7 (4–11)31 (7–75)0.3
James Conner RB4 (2–7)15 (1–49)0.2
Jacoby Brissett QB3 (1–6)13 (1–43)0.1
Tyler Allgeier RB3 (1–6)12 (0–42)0.2

ARI receiving

PlayerTargetsCatchesYardsRec TDs (avg)
Trey McBride TE9 (5–13)6 (3–10)53 (16–107)0.5
Michael Wilson WR8 (5–13)5 (2–8)49 (13–103)0.4
Kendrick Bourne WR3 (1–6)2 (1–5)18 (0–55)0.2
Trey Benson RB2 (1–5)2 (0–3)10 (0–44)0.1
Jeremiyah Love RB2 (0–4)2 (0–3)9 (0–39)0.1
James Conner RB2 (0–4)1 (0–3)8 (0–39)0.1

Touchdown scorers

Share of simulated games in which the player scored; the first-TD scorer is the first touchdown of that same game.

PlayerTeamAnytime TD2+ TDsFirst TD of the game
Jahmyr Gibbs RBDET72.4%34.3%20.9%
Amon-Ra St. Brown WRDET43.4%10.3%9.6%
Trey McBride TEARI37.0%7.2%6.9%
Jeremiyah Love RBARI35.2%6.1%6.7%
Other / unallocated DET34.5%5.8%7.0%
Michael Wilson WRARI34.2%6.1%6.5%
Sam LaPorta TEDET30.8%5.1%5.9%
Jameson Williams WRDET26.7%3.4%5.2%
James Conner RBARI24.9%2.9%4.5%
Trey Benson RBARI22.7%2.5%4.0%
Tyler Allgeier RBARI22.3%2.5%4.0%
Isaac TeSlaa WRDET17.6%1.6%3.2%
Bam Knight RBARI16.2%1.4%2.7%
Kendrick Bourne WRARI15.9%1.1%2.8%
Sione Vaki RBDET11.8%0.6%2.3%
Brock Wright TEDET8.2%0.3%1.5%

First touchdown by team: DET 57.5% · ARI 42.4% · no offensive touchdown 0.1%. Defensive and special-teams touchdowns are not credited to a player.

Representative simulated games

Real runs from this batch, picked by a fixed rule and replayed from their seed. Each is one possible game, not the forecast.

Representative simulation — not the forecast median like: DET 29 – 24 ARI

By quarter: DET 10 / 9 / 7 / 3 · ARI 7 / 3 / 0 / 14

QtrOffenseStart (yds to goal)ResultPlaysYardsScore after (DET–ARI)
1DET65fg9643–0
1ARI65punt3-33–0
1DET88td38810–0
1ARI75td107510–7
1DET65punt31010–7
1ARI77punt4110–7
2DET55fg63013–7
2ARI77turnover25113–7
2DET46fg54516–7
2ARI65fg104216–10
2DET87fg86219–10
2ARI73punt6419–10
3DET63punt5219–10
3ARI92punt32519–10
3DET77td67726–10
3ARI73punt32126–10
3DET88punt33326–10
3ARI92td79226–17
4DET78fg96729–17
4ARI65td66529–24
4DET65punt5529–24
4ARI76end half4629–24
Representative simulation — not the forecast high scoring: DET 38 – 33 ARI

By quarter: DET 14 / 14 / 3 / 7 · ARI 7 / 13 / 13 / 0

QtrOffenseStart (yds to goal)ResultPlaysYardsScore after (DET–ARI)
1DET66punt6370–0
1ARI86opp td2347–0
1ARI70td1707–7
1DET71td127114–7
1ARI68td126814–13
2DET64td56421–13
2ARI69turnover33921–13
2DET99opp td3321–20
2DET65punt6-221–20
2ARI82punt6421–20
2DET48td64828–20
2ARI89end half10-328–20
2ARI63fg33428–23
3DET75punt3-1028–23
3ARI45td14528–30
3DET75fg36831–30
3ARI65fg96131–33
3DET65punt8731–33
3ARI75punt32831–33
3DET86punt34631–33
4ARI97punt32031–33
4DET69td146938–33
4ARI65turnover34138–33
4DET79end half24538–33
Representative simulation — not the forecast low scoring: DET 21 – 16 ARI

By quarter: DET 7 / 7 / 0 / 7 · ARI 3 / 3 / 7 / 3

QtrOffenseStart (yds to goal)ResultPlaysYardsScore after (DET–ARI)
1DET80punt970–0
1ARI76fg5620–3
1DET66punt380–3
1ARI86punt3360–3
1DET97td13977–3
1ARI62fg11517–6
2DET69punt3247–6
2ARI91turnover2297–6
2DET47td64714–6
2ARI63punt31514–6
2DET90end half3614–6
2ARI66td56614–13
3DET81punt65114–13
3ARI94punt45214–13
3DET99punt3114–13
3ARI58punt6314–13
3DET84punt3914–13
3ARI69fg94814–16
4DET70punt3014–16
4ARI73punt3-314–16
4DET69td36921–16
4ARI65punt31621–16
4DET84punt3821–16
4ARI76fg miss64221–16
4DET58punt62021–16
4ARI99end half74521–16

Provenance

Enginenfl-drive-sim-v2 2.0.0-shadow
StatusResearch only · experimental · not promoted · not our main forecast
Runs10,000 · incoherent runs 0 of 10,000
Generated2026-10-10 17:34 UTC · before kickoff 2026-10-11 20:25 UTC
Seed0c20b0f0 · per-run mulberry32 seeded by splitmix(baseSeed, runIndex); baseSeed = fnv1a64(engine|eventId|inputHash)
Team strengthforecast receipt total.median 54 / margin.median -5 (nfl-regular-season-public-v1@v2) · calibrated means ARI 24.49 / DET 29.46
Availabilityinjuries@2026-10-10T17:32:23Z+rosters@2026-10-10T17:32:23Z
MarketNot used as an input
Receiptnfl-sim-v2:401872991:fa7ba9ede10165f3

Not modelled: downs and distance, penalties, timeouts, weather, kickers as players, defensive player stats, and exact final-score frequencies. Those are absent here rather than estimated. Educational and paper-only; not betting advice.