Cleveland Browns at New York Jets
Simulation · experimental · 10,000 coherent game paths
Simulation V2 · experimental · how to read this page
Each run is one internally consistent possible game: drives, plays, player stats and points all add up inside that run. The numbers below summarise all 10,000 simulated games.
This is a separate, experimental engine, not our main forecast. It is not independent of it: each team's scoring level is set so the simulated average total and margin match the Game Time Forecast's expected total and margin. It has not been shown to be more accurate than the Game Time Forecast: on held-out past games its win chances scored slightly worse. It is shown for exploration, takes no betting-market input, and feeds no pick or product. It was frozen before kickoff and is never re-run with live information.
Game Time Forecast · our main model · separate from this simulation
CLE 21 — 19 NYJ · win chance CLE 56.6% · NYJ 40.3% · total 40
A different engine, anchored to the Game Time Forecast's expected total and margin. Open the Game Time Forecast.
Game outcome · Simulation V2
Score distribution
Each team's score
| Team | Low (10th) | Median | High (90th) | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLE | 10 | 21 | 34 | 21.79 |
| NYJ | 7 | 19 | 31 | 18.95 |
Quarters and halves
From the same simulated games, so the quarters add up to each game's final. Overtime is shown above.
| Period | CLE median (80%) | NYJ median (80%) | Both teams (80%) | CLE wins it | NYJ wins it | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 3 (0–10) | 3 (0–10) | 7 (3–17) | 44.6% | 36.0% | 19.4% |
| Q2 | 7 (0–14) | 6 (0–13) | 12 (3–21) | 47.0% | 38.8% | 14.1% |
| Q3 | 3 (0–10) | 3 (0–10) | 7 (0–17) | 43.1% | 36.1% | 20.8% |
| Q4 | 6 (0–13) | 3 (0–10) | 10 (3–20) | 45.3% | 36.8% | 18.0% |
| 1st half | 10 (3–21) | 10 (0–18) | 20 (10–33) | 52.9% | 40.0% | 7.1% |
| 2nd half | 10 (3–20) | 9 (0–17) | 19 (9–31) | 51.4% | 40.2% | 8.4% |
Team box · median (80% range)
| Stat | CLE | NYJ |
|---|---|---|
| Drives | 11 (9–13) | 11 (9–13) |
| Plays | 63 (50–76) | 62 (50–75) |
| Pass attempts | 33 (24–43) | 34 (25–44) |
| Completions | 22 (15–30) | 23 (16–31) |
| Passing yards | 202 (120–296) | 196 (116–289) |
| Passing TDs | 1 (0–3) | 1 (0–3) |
| Interceptions | 1 (0–2) | 1 (0–2) |
| Sacks taken | 2 (0–4) | 2 (0–4) |
| Rush attempts | 26 (18–36) | 25 (17–34) |
| Rushing yards | 112 (55–192) | 104 (50–181) |
| Rushing TDs | 1 (0–2) | 1 (0–2) |
| Field goals made | 2 (0–3) | 1 (0–3) |
Touchdowns per team
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLE | 8.3% | 22.8% | 30.0% | 23.8% | 10.7% | 4.3% |
| NYJ | 11.7% | 29.3% | 30.8% | 18.5% | 7.4% | 2.3% |
Players · median (80% range)
Player lines are slices of the same simulated games: in every run, receivers' catches and yards add up to their passer's, and carries add up to the team's. Volume a named player does not get goes to "Other", so nothing is forced onto a starter. Players ruled out before the simulation get no snaps.
CLE passing
| Player | Attempts | Completions | Yards | TDs (avg) | INTs (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deshaun Watson QB | 33 (24–43) | 22 (15–30) | 202 (120–296) | 1.4 | 0.9 |
CLE rushing
| Player | Carries | Yards | Rush TDs (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quinshon Judkins RB | 12 (7–18) | 44 (15–96) | 0.4 |
| Deshaun Watson QB | 8 (5–13) | 36 (10–81) | 0.2 |
| Dylan Sampson RB | 2 (0–4) | 6 (0–28) | 0.1 |
| Raheim Sanders RB | 1 (0–3) | 3 (0–23) | 0.1 |
CLE receiving
| Player | Targets | Catches | Yards | Rec TDs (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KC Concepcion WR | 7 (3–10) | 4 (2–7) | 32 (6–78) | 0.3 |
| Denzel Boston WR | 5 (2–8) | 3 (1–6) | 30 (3–78) | 0.2 |
| Harold Fannin Jr. TE | 6 (3–9) | 4 (2–7) | 31 (5–76) | 0.3 |
| Quinshon Judkins RB | 4 (1–6) | 3 (1–5) | 18 (0–54) | 0.2 |
| Jerry Jeudy WR | 3 (1–6) | 2 (0–4) | 15 (0–52) | 0.1 |
| Raheim Sanders RB | 2 (1–5) | 2 (0–4) | 11 (0–43) | 0.1 |
NYJ passing
| Player | Attempts | Completions | Yards | TDs (avg) | INTs (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geno Smith QB | 29 (21–38) | 20 (14–27) | 168 (94–256) | 1.0 | 0.9 |
NYJ rushing
| Player | Carries | Yards | Rush TDs (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Braelon Allen RB | 16 (10–23) | 65 (26–126) | 0.5 |
| Geno Smith QB | 5 (2–9) | 19 (3–53) | 0.1 |
| Kene Nwangwu RB | 2 (0–4) | 3 (0–22) | 0.1 |
| Isaiah Davis RB | 1 (0–3) | 1 (0–18) | 0.0 |
NYJ receiving
| Player | Targets | Catches | Yards | Rec TDs (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garrett Wilson WR | 9 (5–14) | 6 (3–10) | 50 (15–104) | 0.3 |
| Kenyon Sadiq TE | 6 (3–9) | 4 (1–6) | 28 (4–73) | 0.2 |
| Mason Taylor TE | 4 (2–8) | 3 (1–5) | 19 (1–56) | 0.2 |
| Isaiah Williams WR | 4 (1–7) | 3 (1–5) | 19 (0–57) | 0.1 |
| Jeremy Ruckert TE | 2 (1–5) | 2 (0–4) | 9 (0–40) | 0.1 |
| Braelon Allen RB | 2 (0–4) | 1 (0–3) | 7 (0–34) | 0.1 |
Touchdown scorers
Share of simulated games in which the player scored; the first-TD scorer is the first touchdown of that same game.
| Player | Team | Anytime TD | 2+ TDs | First TD of the game |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braelon Allen RB | NYJ | 44.4% | 10.6% | 13.8% |
| Quinshon Judkins RB | CLE | 43.7% | 10.1% | 13.3% |
| Garrett Wilson WR | NYJ | 28.4% | 4.0% | 7.7% |
| KC Concepcion WR | CLE | 27.3% | 3.8% | 7.8% |
| Harold Fannin Jr. TE | CLE | 22.3% | 2.3% | 6.1% |
| Deshaun Watson QB | CLE | 21.2% | 2.3% | 6.0% |
| Denzel Boston WR | CLE | 19.7% | 1.9% | 5.1% |
| Kenyon Sadiq TE | NYJ | 18.6% | 1.6% | 4.7% |
| Mason Taylor TE | NYJ | 15.3% | 1.2% | 4.0% |
| Raheim Sanders RB | CLE | 15.0% | 1.0% | 4.0% |
| Jerry Jeudy WR | CLE | 14.2% | 0.9% | 3.7% |
| Isaiah Williams WR | NYJ | 13.7% | 0.7% | 3.3% |
| Dylan Sampson RB | CLE | 12.4% | 0.5% | 3.3% |
| Geno Smith QB | NYJ | 10.0% | 0.4% | 2.6% |
| Jeremy Ruckert TE | NYJ | 8.5% | 0.3% | 2.0% |
| Isaiah Bond WR | CLE | 5.6% | 0.2% | 1.4% |
First touchdown by team: CLE 53.9% · NYJ 45.1% · no offensive touchdown 1.0%. Defensive and special-teams touchdowns are not credited to a player.
Representative simulated games
Real runs from this batch, picked by a fixed rule and replayed from their seed. Each is one possible game, not the forecast.
Representative simulation — not the forecast median like: CLE 22 – 19 NYJ
By quarter: CLE 7 / 5 / 7 / 3 · NYJ 0 / 6 / 3 / 10
| Qtr | Offense | Start (yds to goal) | Result | Plays | Yards | Score after (CLE–NYJ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLE | 67 | punt | 3 | 2 | 0–0 |
| 1 | NYJ | 73 | punt | 8 | 9 | 0–0 |
| 1 | CLE | 82 | punt | 3 | 13 | 0–0 |
| 1 | NYJ | 67 | downs | 6 | 9 | 0–0 |
| 1 | CLE | 41 | punt | 3 | -3 | 0–0 |
| 1 | NYJ | 99 | opp td | 3 | 1 | 7–0 |
| 1 | NYJ | 70 | punt | 4 | 1 | 7–0 |
| 2 | CLE | 68 | turnover | 1 | -1 | 7–0 |
| 2 | NYJ | 37 | fg miss | 8 | 26 | 7–0 |
| 2 | CLE | 80 | punt | 3 | 21 | 7–0 |
| 2 | NYJ | 71 | td | 10 | 71 | 7–6 |
| 2 | CLE | 77 | punt | 4 | 41 | 7–6 |
| 2 | NYJ | 99 | safety | 4 | -1 | 9–6 |
| 2 | CLE | 57 | fg | 6 | 30 | 12–6 |
| 2 | NYJ | 76 | fg | 8 | 44 | 12–9 |
| 3 | CLE | 67 | td | 5 | 67 | 19–9 |
| 3 | NYJ | 80 | fg | 14 | 42 | 19–12 |
| 4 | CLE | 74 | punt | 3 | 5 | 19–12 |
| 4 | NYJ | 70 | punt | 3 | -4 | 19–12 |
| 4 | CLE | 68 | punt | 3 | 0 | 19–12 |
| 4 | NYJ | 59 | td | 4 | 59 | 19–19 |
| 4 | CLE | 69 | fg | 8 | 34 | 22–19 |
| 4 | NYJ | 72 | downs | 4 | 15 | 22–19 |
| 4 | CLE | 43 | end half | 1 | 11 | 22–19 |
Representative simulation — not the forecast high scoring: CLE 30 – 27 NYJ
By quarter: CLE 7 / 7 / 0 / 16 · NYJ 6 / 0 / 14 / 7
| Qtr | Offense | Start (yds to goal) | Result | Plays | Yards | Score after (CLE–NYJ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLE | 73 | turnover | 10 | 21 | 0–0 |
| 1 | NYJ | 55 | td | 7 | 55 | 0–6 |
| 1 | CLE | 70 | td | 11 | 70 | 7–6 |
| 1 | NYJ | 80 | fg miss | 7 | 32 | 7–6 |
| 2 | CLE | 34 | punt | 3 | 13 | 7–6 |
| 2 | NYJ | 99 | punt | 3 | 6 | 7–6 |
| 2 | CLE | 62 | punt | 3 | 0 | 7–6 |
| 2 | NYJ | 96 | downs | 12 | 36 | 7–6 |
| 2 | CLE | 35 | td | 9 | 35 | 14–6 |
| 2 | NYJ | 52 | td | 7 | 52 | 14–13 |
| 3 | CLE | 70 | punt | 3 | 6 | 14–13 |
| 3 | NYJ | 64 | turnover | 7 | 11 | 14–13 |
| 3 | CLE | 50 | downs | 7 | 40 | 14–13 |
| 3 | NYJ | 90 | punt | 7 | 36 | 14–13 |
| 3 | CLE | 75 | punt | 3 | 8 | 14–13 |
| 3 | NYJ | 80 | td | 3 | 80 | 14–20 |
| 3 | CLE | 74 | fg | 7 | 41 | 17–20 |
| 4 | NYJ | 65 | punt | 5 | 1 | 17–20 |
| 4 | CLE | 99 | punt | 3 | 2 | 17–20 |
| 4 | NYJ | 56 | punt | 3 | 7 | 17–20 |
| 4 | CLE | 99 | opp td | 3 | 0 | 17–27 |
| 4 | CLE | 61 | td | 3 | 61 | 24–27 |
| 4 | NYJ | 65 | turnover | 2 | 12 | 24–27 |
| 4 | CLE | 51 | fg | 9 | 41 | 27–27 |
| 4 | NYJ | 68 | punt | 6 | 8 | 27–27 |
| 4 | CLE | 82 | fg | 3 | 75 | 30–27 |
Representative simulation — not the forecast low scoring: CLE 14 – 11 NYJ
By quarter: CLE 0 / 0 / 0 / 14 · NYJ 8 / 0 / 3 / 0
| Qtr | Offense | Start (yds to goal) | Result | Plays | Yards | Score after (CLE–NYJ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NYJ | 82 | punt | 3 | 9 | 0–0 |
| 1 | CLE | 82 | punt | 3 | 0 | 0–0 |
| 1 | NYJ | 63 | turnover | 1 | 38 | 0–0 |
| 1 | CLE | 86 | turnover | 8 | 10 | 0–0 |
| 1 | NYJ | 43 | td | 11 | 43 | 0–8 |
| 1 | CLE | 69 | punt | 3 | 23 | 0–8 |
| 1 | NYJ | 97 | punt | 4 | 24 | 0–8 |
| 2 | CLE | 77 | punt | 6 | 20 | 0–8 |
| 2 | NYJ | 70 | turnover | 4 | 34 | 0–8 |
| 2 | CLE | 60 | punt | 3 | 2 | 0–8 |
| 2 | NYJ | 88 | punt | 4 | 25 | 0–8 |
| 2 | CLE | 72 | turnover | 1 | 48 | 0–8 |
| 2 | NYJ | 89 | punt | 3 | 1 | 0–8 |
| 2 | CLE | 66 | turnover | 6 | 44 | 0–8 |
| 2 | NYJ | 88 | end half | 3 | 60 | 0–8 |
| 2 | CLE | 57 | punt | 3 | 16 | 0–8 |
| 3 | NYJ | 68 | punt | 3 | 2 | 0–8 |
| 3 | CLE | 93 | punt | 6 | 6 | 0–8 |
| 3 | NYJ | 38 | fg | 7 | 7 | 0–11 |
| 3 | CLE | 73 | punt | 3 | 24 | 0–11 |
| 3 | NYJ | 99 | punt | 3 | 2 | 0–11 |
| 3 | CLE | 35 | downs | 7 | 9 | 0–11 |
| 4 | NYJ | 74 | punt | 3 | -5 | 0–11 |
| 4 | CLE | 64 | td | 6 | 64 | 7–11 |
| 4 | NYJ | 81 | turnover | 1 | 0 | 7–11 |
| 4 | CLE | 32 | td | 3 | 32 | 14–11 |
| 4 | NYJ | 60 | downs | 15 | 40 | 14–11 |
| 4 | CLE | 75 | punt | 3 | 11 | 14–11 |
| 4 | NYJ | 67 | turnover | 2 | 0 | 14–11 |
| 4 | CLE | 44 | end half | 2 | -1 | 14–11 |
Provenance
| Engine | nfl-drive-sim-v2 2.0.0-shadow |
|---|---|
| Status | Research only · experimental · not promoted · not our main forecast |
| Runs | 10,000 · incoherent runs 0 of 10,000 |
| Generated | 2026-10-09 18:38 UTC · before kickoff 2026-10-11 17:00 UTC |
| Seed | b3ff1ad4 · per-run mulberry32 seeded by splitmix(baseSeed, runIndex); baseSeed = fnv1a64(engine|eventId|inputHash) |
| Team strength | forecast receipt total.median 40 / margin.median -2 (nfl-regular-season-public-v1@v2) · calibrated means NYJ 19 / CLE 21.1 |
| Availability | injuries@2026-10-09T18:36:32Z+rosters@2026-10-09T18:36:32Z |
| Market | Not used as an input |
| Receipt | nfl-sim-v2:401872983:80405a457ffa435b |
Not modelled: downs and distance, penalties, timeouts, weather, kickers as players, defensive player stats, and exact final-score frequencies. Those are absent here rather than estimated. Educational and paper-only; not betting advice.
